tlaero wrote:lucky loser wrote:It's just a search engine. It finds this site, it finds that site, it doesn't host anything. Attacking a search engine for showing links is like blaming a sidewalk for counterfeiters setting up tables with fake Gucci bags.
I'm not referring to the search engine. I'm referring first to Youtube, where they host a ton of stolen material and profit from people watching it. I referring second to Android, which is full of stolen intellectual property, so much so that most Android OEMs need to pay all the people Google stole from to use Android. That's not to mention that the things Google actually wrote in Android are just a blind copy of everything Apple did. And don't get me started on what they do with your personal data, whether you like it or not. No, I'm not a fan.
Tlaero
I think you are being rather unfair to Google there,
Tlaero. Android is not only
not a copy of anything Apple did, but Google bought the company that developed it initially and built it up as a free and open source mobile device OS around a Linux kernel. I suggest you set your prejudices to one side and look at the wikipedia entry for Android, and while you're at it check out the litigation history of Apple, Microsoft and Oracle against this free, open source OS -- strange that these mutually antagonistic leviathans should get in bed together to carry out a patents war against a lively, innovative competitor rather than trying to out innovate it!
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/08/ ... droid.html(Edit: Actually the main war appears to be not so much against Android or Google, but rather against the device manufacturers who have the temerity to obtain licenses to use Android. Clever eh? Buy our OS and we won't tie you up in legal red tape and insist on you forking out for the dubious patents we claim the free OS is using. Saves actually taking Google to court and risking their lawyers giving us a drubbing.)