shark wrote:The Necrophilia is not, either, specifically prohibited in the rules, does anyone want to open a thread on this topic?
Pedophily is far more unhuman and despicable than that. The victims are still alive and will suffer psichologically all their life.
But somehow necrophilia is far more disturbing to the average human mind, go figure...
Back on topic,
I am a very open minded person. Even if I wont take any pleasure, or participate actively or passively, or even testimony some more devious acts, if such acts are done without any form of cohercion, abuse, and manipulation, I'm ok with it. Foot fetishism, mature sex, scathology, apotemnophilia, bondage, S&M, midget sex, paraphilic infantilism, and the list goes on and on...
If all this things are done by consenting and informed persons, and there is no harm done to anyone (unconsented and non-permanent harm I mean) there is nothing wrong with it. People should be free to do what they like.
That said, my opinion to incest follows this venue.
Regarding underaged incest there is no discussion possible about the validity and acceptance of it. It is incest and it is pedophilia, and utterly wrong because of the damage the child endures.
But when we talk about adults here the matter is so much complex.
If two siblings or cousins share true love, affection, between them, are adults or late teens, fully aware of their acts and emotions, and they both want to share intimacy is that so wrong?
Will people who get aroused by this scenario be more frowned upon than people who get the hots on other people eating excrements?
It is all, in the end, about the message vehiculated by the story/game/movie. Is it a positive message? Look at Rambo II and III (what??), movies where the killing spread is high, and where for each people dead, if they are vilains, it makes the audience cheer in happyness. Or look at Hostel, a movie about torture and sadism, where people loved to see and be choked. The human nature likes to be choked. They like to have their sense of right and wrong to be challenged, maybe to feel more reassured that they have their values right. When Rambo III ends I'm ok because I know it is a movie, those people didn't really die, and I won't resolve all my problems with a machinegun. But behind all the freedom and justice messages the movie gaves us the message is also that violence is an acceptable solution and killing is ok in some circunstances where Stallone or Schwarzenneger appear.
I don't think a story where love, affection, true connection between 2 people, even if they are siblings our cousins, conveys a wronger message than Rambo III. What if 2 brothers love each other? So what? What wrong are they doing to society? Why does it chokes us so much? Is it about the negation of reproduction and perpetuity of human species that is leads to? If so why society begins to accept homosexuality?
Love is love. If it harms no one it is a good thing to encourage.