by Squeeky » Fri, 09Dec11 16:02
I feel grossly sorry for those women (and men for that matter) who become oversized, particularly those whose condition is not essentially of their own doing, like diet, exercise - those with metabolic conditions, like gland malfunctions, are those within my sympathy range.
I wonder. Does the ratio of the "Golden Rule" work universally on what is pleasing to the eye? I think that is a huge factor with me.
Taking those two considerations as mentioned above, I also have to consider temperament/disposition. That is going to take into account too many things.
I'm really looking at someone with a pleasant personality, a purpose in life and a sense of forward planning.
I still feel a need to be distant, when we meet, from a once near neighbour only because of the condition that appears to be metabolic.
And why do I not totally reject her in my mind? She, as a single mum has brought up a very lovely young lady who now regularly serves us at weekly dinner functions prior to going away for study).
Back to her mum. She's raised a lovely daughter but in the meantime she's taken in children of her niece (worrisome girl!) and along with her lovely daughter they are raising them.
There is one factor left out of this "equation". This lady is also carer for her mother.
Now? What is this thread about? Perceived beauty? Naked bodies? Skin colouring that matches one's own?
Me? I know metabolism too frequently adds to all of us. Let me have a woman who cares for herself, shows she cares or you, is good company and wants to plan a shared future.
That unfortunately doesn't seem to in the psyche of many of our younger generations, and for that matter, it is breaking within mine!
Squeaky is clean, I'm just a tad messy!