Wow, just took a look at the contributions-sector.
Stunning! Sexy! Brilliant!
Maybe the is another collaboration in progress?
shark wrote:.
Some various artwork by.... YO (a new nickname for....)
Greebo wrote:Uh, Ehlanna -- what's the difference between the 1st and 2nd of those four?
Ehlanna wrote:Has a change taken place? Just tried to upload a couple more and been told size limit is 1000px wide - it had been 1200.
Ehlanna wrote:Just realised a couple of recent renders are of a suitable size to attach, so ...
Pic 1
Pic 2
Pic 3
Pic 4
Pic 5
Pic 6
PinkVendeta wrote:These are the renders I liked.
Pic 1 - really nice render, only thing I would say is, just above her clit, heading down towards her entrance looks to flat, almost rectangle, not natural looking.
Pic 2 - really like this render, change out the pale back ground for a study in a house, and have her dusting then and it would look great.
Pic 3 - is a nice render, I hate the red back ground, it does not do anything to improve the render, and I hate the pout on her lips, seems real life girls are all pouting in pictures now assuming it to be sexy.
Pic 4 - looks good, girl is a little over weight but natural looking, I think she would have looked better without the tats.
Pic 5 - looks great, I take it the red dot above her lip below her nose is a lip stud?, at first glance it looked like a pimple, there is slightly to much over spill of light on her feet and way to much tat work, but I like the render.
Pic 6 - lovely skin texture, not a fan of the pale back ground, put her into a bed room scene and the render becomes stunning then.
What work flow do You use?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest